09-23-2007, 11:16 AM
Right ! That's a real ommission....
But yesterday I was thinking that for safety purposes a
It involves some work, though.
It could work like this:
One member of our group is responsible for all / or a certain amount of topics. Every night (or week) he checks if there are already so many new posts to fill a page..... each (new) page is then saved privately (as
To make it less frustrating, we could declare a back-up person responsible for only 1 topic each, so we end up with 20 people or so.
DISADVANTAGE: This might create quite some chaos..... people might be using different methods, might forget things etc.
And although with this backup method we wouldn't have a backup that could be instantly brought back to work (in case of a major loss), but at least we wouldn't lose valuable information. At least the
But yesterday I was thinking that for safety purposes a
private, hand-made backupshould be possible, at least.
It involves some work, though.
It could work like this:
One member of our group is responsible for all / or a certain amount of topics. Every night (or week) he checks if there are already so many new posts to fill a page..... each (new) page is then saved privately (as
webarchiveor text-file) into some private back-up folder / volume. I know it's dirty work, but someone has to do it.
To make it less frustrating, we could declare a back-up person responsible for only 1 topic each, so we end up with 20 people or so.
DISADVANTAGE: This might create quite some chaos..... people might be using different methods, might forget things etc.
And although with this backup method we wouldn't have a backup that could be instantly brought back to work (in case of a major loss), but at least we wouldn't lose valuable information. At least the
knowledgewasn't lost !!