Art and Literature

[Freddy]

Just generally. I just read something. Art doesn't need to be beautiful , nice, etc. It only needs to be shocking. And in its earliest days it was shocking because of its beauty, its realism, ... But, since we have seen that all before, that is why Esher, Dali, Picasso, ... each in their own way are always stunning when you saw them the

first

time". But when the shock is over ... Simply, we always need an other appetizer. Compare it with Christo or Spencer Tunick. At first it is stunning and then we very fast say: just an other variation, but that theme we have seen before!

:o :o :o