Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To be or not to be?
#15
Today I realized that there were only 13 minutes between my 2nd post and joeb's. Because of the length of joeb's story, I am pretty sure that he missed mine. And if he would have seen that extra report, I think he wouldn't have been bothering at all about the administrators. Since there is no link at all between this current issue and a probably changed qualification of the organisators of these boards.

When going back to my 1st post now, I think it was a very clear and correct report, in which I nowhere said or suggested that I am against the existence of
changed
mansions or prejudiced about them in a certain way. I play them all, btw.

The variety of the replies by forummembers proved that what I knew out of PMs and emails was right and so, the issue definitely deserved a place on the boards to talk about. Adding or replacing administrators to avoid issues like these? Sorry, sounds like censorship.

To answer teenager Wingy's question ... there is no answer yet about my
green
suggestion. As usual we will listen carefully to everybody and then decide what we best do. Or in this case: not do. And that decision will be like a mansion. It is possible that some people will not like it. In a matter of fact, even this topic is like a mansion. When you don't like it, stay away. There are enough other topics.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 01:23 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by sherryl199 - 02-25-2007, 04:08 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by aquaMat - 02-25-2007, 05:40 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by ryos - 02-25-2007, 06:10 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 02-25-2007, 06:23 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by sherryl199 - 02-25-2007, 08:14 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Spiak - 02-25-2007, 09:25 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 02-25-2007, 09:26 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 10:18 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by joeb - 02-25-2007, 10:31 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 11:36 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by brell - 02-25-2007, 11:48 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 11:53 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 02-26-2007, 12:46 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-26-2007, 08:50 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-26-2007, 02:38 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by joeb - 02-26-2007, 03:14 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by brell - 02-26-2007, 03:58 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by ryos - 02-26-2007, 04:13 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-26-2007, 04:16 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Scout - 02-26-2007, 05:36 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 02-26-2007, 06:29 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by VernJensen - 02-26-2007, 08:33 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by aquaMat - 02-27-2007, 12:49 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Semi-Native - 03-04-2007, 06:54 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-04-2007, 08:59 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 03-05-2007, 01:18 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-05-2007, 02:33 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 03-05-2007, 07:49 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-05-2007, 08:32 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by joeb - 03-06-2007, 12:31 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-06-2007, 08:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)