02-25-2007, 05:15 PM
The only comment I have:
In the last week or so, I've noticed it gets harder and harder to see every new post and keep track of where was what etc. and the reason for this is that we currently have many discussions going on at once (a good thing) but spread out over many boards and even more threads.... so it can happen that similar things are discussed in two or more diffferent categories.
(e.g. Dominator related custom graphic tips.... or -more recently- the question for Jill's hair-color that showed up in two different threads).
What do I want to say with this? I rather plead for less categories (resulting in more threads in each category) than the other way round to minimise the need of changing pages and the possibility of getting lost.
Also I think we should not create a category for an individual mansion, unless the post traffic for that resp. mansion is really getting out of hand. Like -in the old boards - M M & M really DID need an individual category. StarCraft for example, at this point of time, IMHO, does not.
In the last week or so, I've noticed it gets harder and harder to see every new post and keep track of where was what etc. and the reason for this is that we currently have many discussions going on at once (a good thing) but spread out over many boards and even more threads.... so it can happen that similar things are discussed in two or more diffferent categories.
(e.g. Dominator related custom graphic tips.... or -more recently- the question for Jill's hair-color that showed up in two different threads).
What do I want to say with this? I rather plead for less categories (resulting in more threads in each category) than the other way round to minimise the need of changing pages and the possibility of getting lost.
Also I think we should not create a category for an individual mansion, unless the post traffic for that resp. mansion is really getting out of hand. Like -in the old boards - M M & M really DID need an individual category. StarCraft for example, at this point of time, IMHO, does not.