Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To be or not to be?
#3
Very interesting points you both have made.

Even though I know that there are people who do and others who do not love custom graphics, I don't think it is a good idea to
force
the gap (or schism) between those groups (for example by putting their resp. stuff and discussions in two different categories), as I not only think that the two groups can very well exist peacefully next and with each other in the world of MM, but - and that's more important - I strongly believe there are a lot of peoiple out there, who are not so sure if they belong only in one of, or in any of those 2 groups of people.

Just take myself as an example (sorry): I absolutely like MM in its original form, and love designing mansions with the original graphics and trying to work around the limitations of the original tiles and sprites to com e up with something new. On the other hand, I also love and design custom graphics mansions.

And some more than others: I am absolutely no fan of Science Fiction, let alone SciFi-games....so, while I marvel at all the work that has gone into Dominator, I'm not too much of a fan of it, compared to
Mummy's Revenger
or TOTOMBS, which I both think to be fantastic. (But as a designer, I know how fantastic Dominator is....)

So, which group am I belonging too ??

Please be careful !!
Let us not initiate aversities and
opponent groups
where there are in reality only several different points of view

.... as always, BTW.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 01:23 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by sherryl199 - 02-25-2007, 04:08 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by aquaMat - 02-25-2007, 05:40 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by ryos - 02-25-2007, 06:10 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 02-25-2007, 06:23 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by sherryl199 - 02-25-2007, 08:14 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Spiak - 02-25-2007, 09:25 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 02-25-2007, 09:26 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 10:18 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by joeb - 02-25-2007, 10:31 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 11:36 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by brell - 02-25-2007, 11:48 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 11:53 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 02-26-2007, 12:46 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-26-2007, 08:50 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-26-2007, 02:38 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by joeb - 02-26-2007, 03:14 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by brell - 02-26-2007, 03:58 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by ryos - 02-26-2007, 04:13 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-26-2007, 04:16 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Scout - 02-26-2007, 05:36 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 02-26-2007, 06:29 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by VernJensen - 02-26-2007, 08:33 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by aquaMat - 02-27-2007, 12:49 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Semi-Native - 03-04-2007, 06:54 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-04-2007, 08:59 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 03-05-2007, 01:18 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-05-2007, 02:33 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 03-05-2007, 07:49 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-05-2007, 08:32 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by joeb - 03-06-2007, 12:31 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-06-2007, 08:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)