Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To be or not to be?
#2
Hi Freddy -

You
took most of the words right out of my mouth
to coin a phrase. I love Jack, not crazy about JAC type changes. I didn't 'grow up' with all the space games so don't have an afinity for them. I am also very worried that all the changes will lead to 1st person shooter type games - what I definitely do NOT want to play and don't want my grandson playing either. I would guess that was some of JoeB's original motivation for games to play with his son. There are a lot of younger players who have different ideas - their creativity is boggling!!! I do think there is room for both - I just hope that the new doesn't overwhelm the old and result in a schism between the creators of the new and old. I can remember the early custom mansions after the origiinal 8 - what an amazing surprise just when we thought MM couldn't get any better! Now look what has happened.

I have another concern. There seems to be a fair amount of contention among some MM fans. My guess, from reading their letters, is some old grudges and pet peeves. This is a game with a huge diversity in fans - age, geography, skills - so some differences are to be expected. I am just sensing a lot of it lately. I think these new mansions are not always bringing out the best in everyone. I may be way off the mark and just sensitive because I don't want MM to change and lose its
innocence
for lack of a better word!

BTW - I made a duplicate copy of my MM folder and then left the space sprites set up in one of the copies. So far that works although I have not explored it a great deal. I play the StarCraft episodes with the original MM sprites - works just fine for me and I like the way it looks. It doesn't seem to interfere with the difficulty of the games.

So there - my quick thoughts.

Thanks for the post. I guess it will illicit some
interesting
??!! responsed.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 01:23 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by sherryl199 - 02-25-2007, 04:08 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by aquaMat - 02-25-2007, 05:40 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by ryos - 02-25-2007, 06:10 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 02-25-2007, 06:23 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by sherryl199 - 02-25-2007, 08:14 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Spiak - 02-25-2007, 09:25 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 02-25-2007, 09:26 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 10:18 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by joeb - 02-25-2007, 10:31 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 11:36 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by brell - 02-25-2007, 11:48 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-25-2007, 11:53 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 02-26-2007, 12:46 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-26-2007, 08:50 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-26-2007, 02:38 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by joeb - 02-26-2007, 03:14 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by brell - 02-26-2007, 03:58 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by ryos - 02-26-2007, 04:13 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Freddy - 02-26-2007, 04:16 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Scout - 02-26-2007, 05:36 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 02-26-2007, 06:29 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by VernJensen - 02-26-2007, 08:33 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by aquaMat - 02-27-2007, 12:49 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Semi-Native - 03-04-2007, 06:54 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-04-2007, 08:59 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 03-05-2007, 01:18 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-05-2007, 02:33 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Psychotronic - 03-05-2007, 07:49 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-05-2007, 08:32 PM
Re: To be or not to be? - by joeb - 03-06-2007, 12:31 AM
Re: To be or not to be? - by Wingy - 03-06-2007, 08:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)